NATIONALIST SUPPORT GROUP

CLOSURE NOTICE!

2008-10-29T15:34:00.001Z

Nationalist Policies!

2008-09-30T20:47:00.004+01:00

I know there are many nationalists, (some great friends of mine), who believe that a nationalist government or regime should forcibly repatriate all non white immigrants and their descendants. Unfortunately this idea, (which would have been great 40 or maybe even 30 years ago), is no longer a realistic option. One of the concerns I have about this policy is the sheer numbers of non whites we have residing here now, and the lack of white Britons who would ever be prepared to get their hands dirty helping to enforce it. Imagine if you would, a nationalist party getting enough support from the Great British public, to have enough influence to force through legislation of this nature. Now imagine, with new laws in place, the practicalities of physically removing millions of people. Now imagine the non white putting up a fight, and the authorities needing extra personnel to literally put down a rebellion and then force the millions of non whites, against their will, onto boats and planes out of Britain. Where is the extra muscle going to come from? Do you believe that everyone who votes nationalist will even admit it let alone get their hands dirty attempting to enforce the changes that sort of administration will bring? Also worth some deliberation is the almost definite reaction that we would incur from the immensely powerful forces of the so called democratic United States of America, I'm sure we all remember what happened to the Serbs? How can anyone believe that a nationalist Great Britain would not suddenly come under attack from our former ally? The reality is more than likely that cruise missiles will be flying around blowing up our airports, ships, and all our military bases, and all our towns and cities will be baring the brunt of the entire American military might.

With all this as well as other, more political flaws, one has to conclude that enforced repatriation is an impossible dream, and total political suicide. If we are to be serious about stopping and then turning back the tidal wave of non white immigrants, we must come up with a more tangible solution. Firstly a total and complete end to all immigration and asylum, this will have to be reinforced with massive security measures to prevent any illegal entry. All those who entered illegally should then be deported, if they would be in danger in their own country then we will have to find other nations that are prepared to take them. Immigrants who have broken the law here should have their British passports confiscated and be deported to their own countries where hopefully they will be dealt with by that nations authorities. A total ban on all and any ritual slaughter of animals or the import of meat from inhumanly slaughtered animals would mean there would be no access to Halal or Kosher meat, this would see hundreds of thousand of religious Muslims and Jews leaving of their own accord. Social benefits could be reformed along with the availability of social housing so that the poorer white members of our society receive top priority when it comes to benefit money and housing. Buildings used for the purpose of worshipping foreign religions, such as Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism, etc could be regulated to ensure that there is only one of each in every County and or large city. The only religion taught in schools should be Christianity, with the option of Druidism and other ancient European religions. Compulsory national service for all school leavers between the ages of 16 and 21 would see the return of many more of our "guests" to wherever it is they really belong.

To those stubborn enough to still be here after the implementation of all the above mentioned measures, money could be offered to help them not only move, but to help them settle or set themselves up in whatever country they move to. All visa's issued to foreign visitors should be recorded as they enter, and checks should be made to make sure they do not overstay their welcome even by one day. Those who do arrive on a visa are supposed to be here temporarily, should they attempt to stay here any longer than the visa allows they should be permanently banned from obtaining another.

Britain is wasting billions of pounds on foreign aid and fighting foreign wars that are none of our business. We can stop foreign aid and bring our boys and girls back home, thus freeing up the money needed to fund deportations, and having huge numbers of military personnel to guard all our ports, harbours, the channel tunnel, and even to watch our beaches.

These are just a few ideas, some but not all my own, that would if implicated return Great Britain to the country we want it to be. A White European Britain for White European Britons .

But let's keep it real folks!

THE BAILOUT FIASCO!

2008-09-29T12:30:00.003+01:00

I'm no financial genius, (understatement of the century), but one doesn't have to be any kind of a genius to work out that the US governments 700BILLION Dollar bailout of their financial industry is a complete con. How can a country with over 300 Million taxpayers be in so much trouble? Who owns these private businesses who, because of their own corporate greed, lent so much money to people who could not pay it back?

From where I'm standing the money grubbing bankers are going to be bailed out with money borrowed from the world banks, and paid back with interest by the American taxpayer. So Jewish American financiers are given money borrowed from Jewish world bankers, and the American general public will pay that money back, plus the interest.

WHO ON EARTH MAKES THIS STUFF UP?

I would love to be a fly on the wall at the next Bilderberg Group conference!!

Here is what the guys at Alternet have to say:

The Fiscally Insane Bailout Bill Might Not Pass -- Here's 5 Reasons It Shouldn't

By David Sirota, Blog For Our Future. Posted Sept 29th 2008

There was news Sunday afternoon of a congressional deal to bailout Wall Street fat cats with $700 billion of taxpayer cash . Though the deal negotiated between congressional leaders and the White House is better than what Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson originally proposed early last week, it remains an insulting atrocity, having omitted even basic aid to homeowners, bankruptcy reforms and any modicum of future financial industry regulation. Now, the New York Times reports that the Democratic leadership may not have the votes to pass this bailout. So without further ado, here are the top 5 reasons (in no order) why every single member of Congress -- Democrat and Republican -- should vote this sucker down. Please feel free to copy and paste this post into an email to your congressperson. They are deciding right now -- let them hear your voice.

1.This Bailout's Inherent Fiscal Insanity Could Make Problem Worse

When an individual consumer uses a new credit card to pay off astounding debt from an old credit card, it's akin to check kiting, which is is illegal. Apparently, though, when the government does it, it's billed as Serious Public Policy. Because that's what this supposedly prudent bailout bill would do: Force taxpayers to borrow $700 billion from foreign banks to pay off the bad debt of Wall Street banks. During a crisis that is aimed at preventing interest rates from skyrocketing, nobody has been able to explain how adding almost a trillion dollars to the interest rate-exacerbating national debt would do anything other than undermine the plan's underlying objective. Worse, the U.S. Treasury Department itself admits that the $700 billion number is "not based on any particular data point" -- that is, they created it out of thin air because "We just wanted to choose a really large number." Slapping that amount of money onto the national credit card when our government can't even justify the amount is beyond absurd -- it is insane.

It didn't have to be this way, of course. As I noted in my newspaper column this week, Senator Bernie Sanders proposed a temporary tax on millionaires to finance part of this bailout. Similarly, Blue Dog Democrats proposed a future tax on financial firms if and when taxpayers lose cash on the deal. These proposals were discarded in favor of language asking the government to "submit a plan to Congress on how to recoup any losses," according to the Associated Press. Not only is that language toothless, but it opens up the possibility of a plan being submitted that says we should raise middle-class taxes or slash middle-class social programs to pay for Wall Street's misbehavior.

2. Experts on both the left and right say this bailout could make things worse

Primum non nocere is the latin phrase for "first do no harm" -- the priority principle for any EMT working on a sick patient. It should be the same priority for Congress at this moment -- and a growing group of esteemed experts on both the Right and Left are insisting that this bailout bill could make things worse. Here's a review:

The Washington Post reported on Friday, almost 200 academic economists "have signed a petition organized by a University of Chicago professor objecting to the plan on the grounds that it could create perverse incentives, that it is too vague and that its long-run effects are unclear."
NYU's Nouriel Roubini, the visionary who had been predicting this meltdown, says "The Treasury plan (even in its current version agreed with Congress) is very poorly conceived and does not contain many of the key elements of a sound and efficient and fair rescue plan."
Harvard's Ken Rogoff, a Former Federal Rerserve and IMF official, insists that the prospect of this bailout is, unto itself, taking a manageable problem and making it into a more intense crisis. He says that credit is frozen primarily because banks want to avoid dealing with other banks that might drive a hard bargain, and instead would rather wait for free money from the government. Without the prospect of that free money, Rogoff suggests that credit would probably begin moving again, if slowly.
Dean Baker of the Center on Economic and Policy Research says that spending so much cash so quickly on such a poorly conceived plan could have the effect of making it impossible to fund economic stimulus that is the real way out of this mess. "Suppose the Paulson plan goes through," he writes. "It is virtually certain that the economy will weaken further and the number of foreclosures and people without jobs will continue to rise. This is the fallout from a collapsing housing bubble…When families respond to their loss of home equity by cutting back their consumption it will deepen the recession. In this context it might prove very important to have the resources needed to provide a substantial stimulus. [and] there is no doubt that this bailout will make further stimulus much more difficult to sell politically."

The scheme would force taxpayers to absorb the pain, while Wall Street execs reap the gain.

Meanwhile, it's not even close to clear that this is a problem that requires such an enormous response. As mentioned above, the Treasury Department admits it has absolutely no factual basis for requesting $700 billion -- an amount equivalent to about 5 percent of our entire economy. Additionally, the Washington Post reports that "Banks throughout the United States carried on with the business of making loans yesterday even as federal officials warned again that their industry is on the verge of collapse, suggesting that the overheated language on Capitol Hill may not reflect the reality on many Main Streets." Indeed, "many smaller banks said they were actually benefiting from the problems on Wall Street" and "even some of the nation's largest banks, which have pushed hard for a federal bailout, deny that the current situation is forcing them to reduce lending."

The questions, then, are simple: In the face of this bipartisan opposition from objective experts, why should a lawmaker instead believe the same Bush officials who helped create this crisis with their deregulation, the same Bush officials who just months ago said everything was AOK? Shouldn't there be almost complete unanimity among both objective and partisan observers before spending 5 percent of our entire economy after just one harried week of White House demands? Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. It's time, as The Who said, that we "don't get fooled again."

3. There are clearly better and safer alternatives

The mantra throughout the week has been that America has "no choice" but to pass Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's $700 billion giveaway -- that, in effect, there are no alternatives. But that's an out-and-out lie -- one with a motive: Making it seem as if the only thing we can do is hand the keys to the federal treasury over to both parties' corporate campaign contributors.

The truth is, there are a number of alternatives. Here are just a few:

In the Washington Post last week, Galbraith outlined a multi-pronged plan shoring up and expanding the FDIC, creating a Home Owners Loan Corporation, resurrecting Nixon's federal revenue sharing, and taxing stock transactions (a tax that would fall mostly on speculators) to finance the whole deal.
The Service Employees International Union has drafted a plan based around a massive investment in public services and national health care, and regulatory reforms preventing foreclosures and forcing banks to renegotiate the predatory terms of their bad mortgages.
For those in the mindless, zombie-ish "someone has to do something, so we have to do what the White House says!" camp, consider the possibility that you are under the spell of the same kind of White House fear that led us to invade Iraq because of Saddam's supposed WMD. Consider, perhaps, that there may not even be a compelling basis for doing anything just yet (or at least not anything nearly so huge), and that the whole reason there is this urgent push right now has nothing to do with the financial situation, and everything to do with creating the political dynamic to pass a wasteful giveaway -- one that couldn't be passed otherwise without a sense of emergency. And ask yourself why you would listen to this White House instead of listening to those experts who have been predicting this crisis and are now advising against this bailout -- experts like CEPR's Baker. In two separate posts (here and h er e), he says that letting the problem play out could be the best path, because Treasury and the Fed may already have the tools they need. Following this path, the worst thing that happens is "The Fed and Treasury will have to step in and take over the banks [which] is exactly what many economists argue should happen anyhow," Baker writes. "So the outcome of the worst case scenario is a really frightening day in which the whole world financial system is shaken to its core, followed by a government takeover of the banks. Eventually the government straightens out the books and sells them off again. But the real threat here is not to the economy, it is to the banks."
Then there is the idea of simply taking the $700 billion and simply give it to struggling homeowners to help them pay off part of their mortgages. This hasn't even been discussed but the thought experiment it involves is important to understanding why there is, indeed, an alternative to the Paulson plan. If the root of this problem is people not being able to pay off their mortgages, and those defaults then devaluing banks' mortgage-backed assets, then simply helping people pay their mortgages would preserve the value of the mortgage-backed assets and recharge the market with liquidity. That would be a bottom-up solution helping the mass public, rather than a top-down move helping only financial industry executives.

On this latter proposal, some may argue that giving any relief to homeowners is "unfair" in that those homeowners created their problems, so why should taxpayers have to help them? But then, is helping homeowners any less fair than simply giving all the money away to Wall Street, no strings attached? I'd say no -- and helping homeowners also serves a second purpose: namely, keeping people in their homes, which not only helps them, but helps an entire neighborhood (as any homeowner knows, nearby properties can be devalued when foreclosures hit).

4. Any Incumbent Voting for This Puts Themselves At Risk of Being Thrown Out of Office

As a preface, let me state that I think we live in a country where politicians too often listen to their donors and to the Establishment rather than their constituents, not the other way around. America is a country where our leaders dishonestly invoke the concepts of "Statesmanship" and "Seriousness" and their supposed hatred of "pandering" to justify ignoring what the public wants (as if giving the public what it wants is somehow not the objective of a democratic republic). So, in short, I don't think there's anything wrong with this bill being "politicized" by coming down the pike right before an election -- in fact, I think it's a good thing because the election -- and the fear of being thrown out of office forces our politicians to at least consider what the public wants. I mean, really -- would we rather have this decision made after the election, when the public can be completely ignored?

Polls overwhelmingly show a public that sees voting for this bill as an act of economic treason whereby the bipartisan Washington elite robs taxpayer cash to give their campaign contributors a trillion-dollar gift. As just two of many examples, Bloomberg News' poll shows "decisive" opposition to the bailout proposal, and Rasmussen reports that their surveys show "the more voters learn about the proposed $700 billion federal bailout plan for the U.S. economy, the more they don't like it." Put another way, this bailout proposal has unified both the Right and Left sides of the populist uprising that I described in my new book and that is now even more angry than ever.

Any sitting officeholder that votes for this -- whether a Democrat or a Republican -- should expect to get crushed under a wave of populist-themed attacks from their opponents. We've already seen it start. In Oregon, Democratic challenger Jeff Merkley (D) is airing scathing television ads hammering Republican incumbent Gordon Smith for potentially supporting the deal. Similarly, this morning on Meet the Press, we saw Republican Senate challenger Bob Schaffer (CO) dishonestly papering over his own votes for deregulation and ripping into his opponent Rep. Mark Udall (D) for potentially supporting the deal. Incumbents, get ready for that kind of election-changing heat in your face if you vote "yes."

This, by the way, could play out in the presidential contest. Barack Obama has been taking the advice of the Wall Street insiders in his campaign in endorsing this bailout. McCain has endorsed the vague outline, but he may ultimately back off once he sees the details, allowing him to then run the last month of the campaign as the economic populist in the race. I'm not saying it would work, considering McCain's 26-year record of supporting the deregulatory agenda that created this crisis. But such a move could end up help him flank Obama on the defining economic issues of the race.

5. Corruption and Sleaze Are Swirling Around These Bailouts -- and America Knows It

The amount of brazen corruption and conflicts of interest swirling around this deal is odious, even by Washington's standards -- and polls suggest the public inherently understands that. Consider these choice nuggets:

Warren Buffett is simultaneously advising Obama to support the deal, while he himself is investing in the company that stands to make the most off the deal.
McCain's campaign is run by lobbyists from the companies that stand to make a killing off a no-strings government bailout.
The New York Times reports that the person advising Paulson and Bernanke on the AIG bailout was the CEO of Goldman Sachs -- a company with a $20 billion stake in AIG.
The Obama campaign's top spokesman pushing this deal is none other than Roger Altman, who Bloomberg News reports is simultaneously "advising a group of investors who are trying to prevent their shares from being diluted in the U.S. takeover of American International Group Inc." -- that is, who have a direct financial interest in the current iteration of the bailout.

Add to this the fact that the negotiations over this bill have been largely conducted in secret, and you have one of the most sleazy heists in American history.

**********

If this bill passes, it will be a profound referendum on the dominance of money over democracy in America. That -- and that alone -- would be the only thing an objective observer could take away from the whole thing.

Money will have compelled politicians to not only vote for substantively dangerous policy, but vote for that policy even at their own clear electoral peril. Such a vote will confirm that the only people these politicians believe they are responsible for representing are are the fat-cat recipients of the $700 billion -- the same fat cats who underwrite their political campaigns, the same fat-cats who engineered this crisis, and want to keep profiteering off it. Any lawmaker who takes that position is selling out the country, as is any issue-based political non-profit group -- liberal or conservative -- that uses its resources to defend a "yes" vote rather than demand a "no" vote. This is a bill that forces taxpayers to absorb all of the pain, and Wall Street executives to reap all of the gain. It doesn't even force the corporate executives (much less the government leaders) culpable in this free fall to step down -- it lets them stay fat and happy in their corner office suites in Manhattan.

Even if they believe that something must be done right now, lawmakers should still vote no on this specific bill, and force one of the very prudent alternatives to the forefront. They shouldn't just vote no on Paulson's proposal -- they should vote hell no. Our economy's future depends on it.

Here we go again!

2008-09-21T18:16:00.001+01:00

Just in case anyone didn’t understand

It’s a shame, but a recent communication has led to my believing that not everyone reading actually understands what I’m saying, or is deliberately quoting me out of context. It doesn’t really matter, I have long since stopped caring what peop

le think of me. But those who seek to spread disinformation, are not doing anyone any favours.

In my last post I mentioned the mess this country is in, and of that there can be no doubt whatsoever. I also mentioned that I believe we are running out of time, and that the only realistic alternative to the Zionist “mainstream” is the BNP

I meant what I wrote then and still do, but that doesn’t mean that I’ve had some kind of road to Damascus change of ideology. First and foremost I will always be fundamentally National Socialist, politically I am still White Nationalist as I believe that to be the modern version of NS. What I don’t believe is that the people of this nation are even remotely ready for a hardcore White Nationalist government, that will not happen in any of our lifetimes. So what are we supposed to do? We are so small in numbers that there is zero chance of us ever ceasing power by force, yes it is possible to get a nice little team together, but a few hundred people will never be enough. Just look at any football match on the television, or even attend one. There are hundreds of thousands of mainly white people attending football matches every week, wouldn’t it be great if we could get those sort of numbers? Or maybe the kind of numbers Oswald Mosley’s BUF used to attract? Unfortunately society has demonised us to the point that our own people actually fear us, what is the good of that? We have to try and get the masses on our side, not just the voters, but police officers and members of the armed services.

If my predictions are correct, then there will be a general election some time in 2009, and we have nowhere near enough time to build anything even remotely ready top take on the main establishment parties. Therefore we have two choices, we either help maintain the Zionist grip on British politics, or we all get behind the British National Party and give the ZOG a right bloody nose. I don’t see the BNP taking power next year, but I do believe they will get people elected into the House of Commons and the European Parliament.

Let us give them a chance and see what they do, I for one have no intention of getting involved with anyone or anything that could or might jeopardise their chances.

The time for raking over the old coals is after the elections, when the dust has settled.

CALLING ALL NATIONALISTS!

2008-09-18T19:08:00.005+01:00

Time is running out!

Are you not convinced? Do you really think there is time for indecision?

I suggest you think again! The whole of what is often referred to as Western Civilisation is crumbling, not just from our point of view either. The train spotter types among political commentators have always been able to dismiss our warnings as mere “scaremongering”, now they are getting ready to re-enact 1979. Those of us who remember or know what happened back then will also know what I mean by this. You see there is not a great deal of difference between the circumstances of that time and those we find ourselves in now. If anything the situation is worse for the establishment now than it was then, but they will use the same tactics to deal with it as they did, and expect the Great British public to swallow it just as they did before.

Back in 1979, with a general election looming, and a grossly unpopular government and Prime Minister, (Labour’s James Callaghan), the nation was in total disarray. We were up to our eyeballs in debt, there was mass unemployment, airlines were going out of business leaving holiday makers stranded, prices were going up and wages were going down, there was huge shortages in fuel, which by then had led to power cuts, and the backlash caused at that time was a devastating series of strikes, by trades unions in every industry, remember they had huge powers back then.

In the run up to the 1979 General Election, John Tyndall’s National Front, indisputably Britain’s biggest Nationalist organisation by far at the time, were looking likely to make huge gains. The electorate were aware of the problems caused by immigration, and with everyone being so poor and everything so scarce, they were ready to look for an alternative government, a government that would deal with immigration. The NF worked hard and a large number of candidates were ready and in place in time for the people to make that change as they went to the country. Then came the leader of the opposition, one Mrs Thatcher, an ex education minister who had not long since attended her first Bilderberg Group conference, before climbing to the very top of the Conservative Party and becoming it’s leader. Suddenly she was promising the British people that she would deal with the problem of immigration, this would be her first priority, closely followed by a series of hard hitting political reforms that would eventually see the unions lose their grip on the nation, and economical reforms that would see a complete end to Britain’s crippling trade deficits.

One could be forgiven for over indulging ones self in what happened next. Given the promises made by a seemingly safe and familiar political organisation, the country elected Thatcher and her Conservatives with a huge majority, and the NF lost all it’s deposits. Of course it would soon transpire that Thatcher was lying when she said she would deal with immigration. She did however intend to break the trade unions grip on the UK, and in doing so opened the immigration flood gates still wider, as foreign labour was brought in to make sure work was done during strikes. The country was conned, and even though the economy boomed during the mid 1980’s, the ever growing immigrant population would eventually see the bubble burst.

There is no point in going over the effect that Blair and Brown have had on the UK during 11 years of high public spending and the inevitable borrowing that accompanied it. It is plain to see that yet another Labour government has taken us to the brink of what will certainly be the worst recession in almost all of our lifetimes. I sincerely doubt that Brown and his government will stay in power for their full term, which would see them remain in office for the best part of another two years. They are on their last legs, and Brown is appearing increasingly punch drunk. And so with another general election probably less than a year away, we can expect David Cameron, another Bilderburg member, to start making all the right noises about how he will deal with the problem of immigration. It will of course be up to wise old heads to ensure that those of us who don’t remember 1979 are duly warned.

Unfortunately there is more to this than already mentioned. Great Britain has still only one Nationalist organisation ready and able to challenge the phoney politicians of the so called “mainstream”. Unfortunately personal disputes, disagreements with regards to policy modernisation, and the infiltrators of the left, have divided British Nationalism to the point where so called “purists” or “hardliners” will be putting up alternative candidates of their own, thus confusing the electorate and splitting the Nationalist vote.

I make no bones about writing, or indeed saying this. The British National Party (BNP) are the only viable choice. It is either the BNP or another twenty years of phoney government, which I believe would see nearly all British towns and cities follow Leicester’s lead and become majority non white.

If and when we become a minority, we will also be outvoted. There will then be no way back for Britain, as the children and grandchildren of those immigrants begin to elect themselves and each other.

My message to all Nationalists is to join or rejoin the BNP, if they’ll have you. Don’t take it personally if they won’t, take a leaf out of my book. And support them anyway, its our only option.

PSW.

2008-09-17T10:57:00.002+01:00

Crisis Britain ~ The Gathering Storm Clouds

Racial Comrades, I believe that the time has come for all British Nationalists, whether purist or moderniser, to get ready to embrace our vindication. The days of the capitalist politician are numbered, the British government are literally clinging to power like a rat to the driftwood from an already sunken ship. This is the time when our people will know that we were right all these years, that we warned them and their failure to listen has cost them dearly.

Do not underestimate the mess this once great nation now finds itself in, or the effect that a major recession will have on a people who have been lied to for decades. And as the headlines have changed from “Violent Britain” to “another Black Monday”, as holidaymakers are trapped overseas because airlines are going bankrupt, as fuel prices become so high that we cannot afford to run our vehicles, as more dead soldiers are brought back from Iraq and Afghanistan, as more parents bury their children who have been

murdered by other children, as we worry about our savings and pensions while banks and insurance companies go bust, as the supply of food becomes shorter and grocery prices continue to rise, as the power cuts start because there is not enough fuel to generate electricity. We are less than twelve months away from civil unrest, Pandora’s box is about to be opened, and revolution is almost certain.

I believe that the none indigenous ethnic groups will provide the spark that will ignite the flame. The fingers will be pointing at them, there presence has overcrowded our island, and after decades of state protection they will suddenly feel the insecurity and the fear of the coming backlash. I believe there will be riots, it will be an unpleasant and unstable yet historical moment, the moment of truth. The riots will surely escalate into what will become hundreds of localised small scale civil wars. People will be hurt, huge sacrifices will be made, but whatever the outcome our nation will never be the same again.

There will never be a better time for Nationalism in the UK than this next twelve to eighteen months. Our message to the people must me loud and clear, a positive message with the offer of reasonable alternatives to the garbage we have been fed by the politicians who put us in this predicament. Not a message of hatred towards people who are only here, because they were allowed here by greedy politicians and money men with their eye on cheap labour, but a message of love for our country and for our people, a message of hope.

We must put aside our differences become united and as one we must lead our people towards their freedom, towards salvation. This will be our first real opportunity but it will be Britain’s last chance. Failure will not be an option, and we will not fail, nationalism is the only solution and that solution will be provided.

Can you see as I do, the light at the end of the tunnel? Then keep marching forward Comrades, we are almost there!

VIOLENT YOUTH CRIME!

2008-09-15T13:46:00.003+01:00

Young People Out Of Control

It is a sad fact that even in this age of modern wonders, this age where young people have more to do and better facilities than previous generations could have even dreamt of, that many of the youth of great Britain are mindless violent thugs. Teenagers are increasingly involved in crimes that even most of us who did our growing up during the deprivation of the Thatcher error would never have contemplated. As a teenager in the early 1980’s I clearly remember there being a lot of violent crime in my home town of Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire, yes there were plenty of people being stabbed, glassed, even murdered. I don’t however recall hearing about many, if any, of the attacks being carried out by youngsters. So with over twenty-five young people being murdered by other young people this year in London alone, one has to wonder why, and how it can be stopped.

It has been suggested on more than one occasion that it could have something to do with the friction caused by the introduction of so many different races and cultures into what was already a crowded island, and there can by no denying that this is one of the main reasons. But is there anything else involved? What about the lack of discipline in our schools, and just as importantly the lack of respect young people often have for their parents, let alone other adults? It has long been my belief that things began to get worse around 1982, when corporal punishment was abolished in schools. I was just about to leave when this legislation was announced, and remember laughing at my head of year when I was given my first taste of what they called “solitary confinement”. This consisted of my being locked in a small room with a chair, a desk, and a book, and being told to write an essay. Two hours later I was allowed out to use the toilets and of course I went straight home. Of course I was then punished for truancy, with a two week suspension! I left school shortly after that, and now have five children of my own, two of which have already finished school. If our schools were about to become a complete joke in 1982, then I can tell you that they most certainly are a complete joke now, only nobody appears to be laughing.

Ok, so teachers can’t whack the children anymore, and head masters cannot cane them, and I’m sure most children are more than happy about that. But what good is this doing for them in the long run? Remember the saying, “you can’t teach an old dog new tricks”? To install discipline into children is difficult, but not as difficult as it is to a spoilt and unruly young adult. So instead of learning their lessons at school when properly punished for being naughty, they are growing up into young adult delinquents and ending up in jail, on drugs, or dead. Of course this doesn’t apply to all children, but the percentages are increasing, especially among those from working class, or more specifically single parent families. Personally I have nothing but respect and admiration for single mothers, and sometimes fathers, who struggle for years to bring up their children alone, such commitment and devotion. But when you take one parent out of a child’s family and there is no discipline at school, then it is obvious that he or she will become much more vulnerable to outside influences. It is a fact that children learn from adults and by copying them, if mum or dad is at home every day with no money and up to his or her eyeballs in laundry and dirty dishes, the child is much more likely to envy and admire the apparently luxurious lifestyle of the local drug dealer, for example. Criminals are using young children to transport their contraband these days, be it drugs, weapons, or even money, so it is obvious what those young people will be wanting to do when they grow up, if they grow up.

This is a very bleak picture, I know, but I’m only scratching the surface. The boundaries are being pushed further with every generation, and the moral fibre of modern society has almost disappeared. Lessons are not being learnt, and hardly anything is being passed down through the generations to help the adolescent’s mental growth. It is time we all took a step back, and think this through, what can we do to put this right? How can we reverse decades of moral decline, and at least try to ensure that future generations get a proper and disciplined start in life?

Well I’ll have to start with the separation of all the different cultures and traditions, as a nationalist it is well documented that I believe in the repatriation of none whites from our island. But it has to go much further than that, even if all the children are indigenous white Europeans we will still be left with huge numbers of delinquents. Parents will have to be taught how to instil routine, good behaviour, manners, and respect into their children. A reintroduction of corporal punishment in schools will also help, but I’m afraid that the teachers and headmasters of today would most certainly require a great deal of retraining, having said that they do get plenty of time off to do it in. The icing on the cake would most certainly be a reintroduction of National Service for any school leaver who doesn’t go into higher education or full time employment, with a secondary level of recruitment for those who drop out before they reach the age of 21. I am aware that the ranks of our professional armed services could not be realistically swelled with every unemployed youngster, as many simply wouldn’t be fit for purpose. And so junior officers and NCO’s would have to take control of turning these boys into men, (so to speak), as part of their own training. Get them up in the morning, make them keep their things and themselves clean and tidy, make them exercise, and if they are not fit to join the ranks of the regular services, then they can look after old people’s gardens, paint railings, decorate public buildings, sweep the roads etc.

We owe it to ourselves as the next generation of old aged pensioners, and to the youngsters themselves to reinstall this discipline and sense of self esteem and pride. With the right amount of thought and consideration, backed up by real positive actions, we can save the future generations from themselves, for both our sakes and theirs.

PSW.

2008-09-14T12:34:00.003+01:00

Time for the Nationalist Right!

During the six years or so that I have been politically involved in White Nationalism, one thing has always left me somewhat bemused. It’s the lack of balance, and this is something that I have been discussing lately with my good friend and Comrade Eddy Morrison. Apart from a few cranks who hold the occasional talking shop, who even though they have no political purpose still invite other nationalists to their meetings, the right wing is very light in nationalism these days. I’ve heard it said that the BNP have sought to get rid of it’s "right wing", and that this has made it heavy in the centre with a liberal element drifting slightly to the left. However my analysis is not about the BNP, it is my belief that those outside that organisation, the so called hardliners, those who prefer to gather in small groups and refer to themselves as National Socialists, although having met most and known many of them, I am certain that well over 90% would never make the grade in a real NS regime. Indeed had they been born in 1930’s Germany they would probably be looked upon as “untermesnchion”.

As British White Nationalists, or indeed British Nationalists, they appear hell-bent on alienating other white Britons who may well be patriotic, but are never going to approve of the obvious Strasserite style racial bolshevism. Now more than ever I am hearing so called White Nationalists, as well as pretend “Neo Nazis”, calling to abolish the Union Flag, and even the Royal Family. Indeed one self proclaimed leader has even written about a desire to see the heads of all the Royal Family on spikes. And these are the people who say they are building a movement that will one day save White Britons from the tyranny of the Zionist Occupational Government. Talk about out of the frying pan into the fire? Not that this kind of cult obsession is ever likely to gain any kind of political support, let alone success. Never mind, perhaps they are planning a coup de tat? There is more chance of us all dying of laughter at my hilarious jokes.

So why do they do it? Why is it that even after so many failed attempts at pushing the hard line approach, the same mistakes are still being made by the same people? And why are a few hundred well meaning individuals prepared to give up their own time and money in order to help them continue? But then what percentage of the population are required to support and sustain a political organisation? The way I see it is that White Nationalism in the UK, at this moment in time, is little more than a few egocentrically challenged misfits leading two or three hundred left of centre racists blindly towards oblivion.

So National Socialists, or White Nationalists if we prefer to call ourselves who are distributionist, there is nothing wrong with that sentiment. But when a nation's assets, or wealth is distributed, it cannot be to everyone. To make all citizens equal is Communism, and we are not Communists. There has always been a pecking order, natural selection, if you prefer, and in a nationalist country the need for this will surely increase. Those who contribute the most shall gain the most, that is how progress is made. Take that away, and a man who could have made it as a scientist or a doctor could well find it easier to sweep the road if it earns him the same money. I believe that different jobs should be allocated different ranks, military style perhaps. This has nothing to do with global capitalism, this is to do with national government rewarding the achievements of it’s citizens in it’s quest to become a successful autonomous self sufficient white nation. There is no point in gaining political success, only to run the country into the ground and end up being opposed and deposed by our own people.

Before all that we have still got to gain public support. I believe that this cannot be achieved unless we can convince our countrymen that we are proud of our nation as well as our race, and that we wish to carry the flag of our nation, the Union Flag, into our battle to regain our country and reinstall the kind of national pride that once made Britain great! I don’t believe that any display of disloyalty towards our Monarch would be in any way helpful, in fact it would surely lose us more support than it would gain for us.

So what I believe we need is a fiercely patriotic British White Nationalist organisation, an organisation that is proud of Britain’s rich indigenous culture and history, proud to fly the Union Flag triumphantly, proud of the contribution made over the centuries by our Royal Family, and determined to reinstate Britain as the Great nation it once was. The only way to do this of course being to repatriate all non whites by whatever means necessary, to take all businesses, be they financial, industrial, or whatever under state control, ban homosexuality, bring back the death penalty and so on.

Without it’s "right wing" nationalism is floundering, it is time to resuscitate the right!

For Nation & Race, P, S, Williamson.

AMIR KAHNT!

2008-09-13T16:46:00.002+01:00

Oh dear what a pity never mind!

We were supposed to believe this Muslim was a "British" boxing

icon. So here it is for all those lefty liberal scum bags and psudoe

intellectual oddballs who try to tell us what we know to be wrong.

He is not BRITISH, anymore than a dog born in a stable is a horse.

And he is not a very good boxer either!

Re: SEARCHLIGHT MAGAZINE!

2008-09-06T17:07:00.003+01:00

I know, and am relieved to know that not everybody involved in

NATIONALISM would even think about buying Searchlies, let

alone give them information. So it is sad to know that some

people actually think it is clever to speak to them.

So for the last time, as I have generally got better things to do

than babysit idiots. Gable is the enemy, not just to us but to

anyone who doesn't toe his State Sponsored and authority

friendly line. FFS even the real reds don't trust Gable and co,

and he is supposed to be on their side. So maybe someone can

explain to me WHY any so called Nationalist should ever enter

into any kind of dialogue with him or any of his minions?

As for the FACT that if Nationalists stopped buying their rag it

would go out of business?

Heres a clue: Don't buy it!

To those who read this and choose to ignore it. If you haven't

had your fingers burnt yet, then you soon will.

Even the best snake handler gets bit.

And you will deserve it.

How to stop the Drugs Trade!

2008-09-04T17:42:00.002+01:00

No matter how you look at it, or what your
political opinion is. You cannot deny that there
IS a problem with drugs in Great Britain.

And the problem is not being dealt with, it
never has been.

A different approach to “recreational” drugs.

Something I have often thought about over the years, what should be done about the lucrative and illicit trade in dangerous and illegal drugs? As someone who has worked in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals, and wholesale buying and selling of alcohol and tobacco products, I have come to a conclusion that I’m sure most people at first glance will have difficulty understanding, some might even go as far as to call these ideas controversial, such is life.

Now the reason I mention my experiences in the alcohol and tobacco trades, is because I believe many parallels can be drawn by comparing them. Drinking alcohol and smoking tobacco are both highly dangerous, and both highly addictive, they are also both totally legal. On the other hand other drugs like cocaine, amphetamines, non medicinal opiates, and cannabis, are all just as dangerous and just as addictive, yet they are all illegal. Recently the British government declassified the personal use of cannabis, which was seen by many as an invitation for many users of that drug to admit their liking of it. It was a typical political experiment, and it backfired, but why? In my opinion this political gesture of tolerance was made deliberately in a way that it was doomed to fail right from the start. The more tolerant approach to the personal use of the drug did nothing to change the fact that users still had to buy it from illegal dealers. So why did they bother? It has been reported that in order to meet the new demands for cannabis, dealers are selling substances much stronger ,and potentially much more dangerous, than they were say twenty or so years ago. As someone who has always hated the smell of cannabis I can honestly say that whatever people are smoking these days can be smelt a mile off. So what possible good could have come out of all this? Well frankly no good whatsoever.

If the British government wish to deal with the problems caused by the use of illegal drugs there can only be two ways of going about it. The first is the age old process of prohibition, total zero tolerance, one might however argue that such methods have never worked in the past, and they never will. The other, and highly controversial method would be to totally legalise the whole lot, I’m not joking.

Imagine if you would, a Britain where the drug dealer was put totally out of business by the pharmaceutical companies. Where a drug user or addict would purchase his or her substances from a chemist, knowing that it had been manufactured to exact specifications, under the supervision of a qualified chemist, in a sterile environment regularly inspected by the MCA. All batches tested rigorously in laboratories, every stage of manufacturing process scrutinised by experienced quality assurance officers. And then with every gram accounted for dispatched to the chemist shops to be dispensed by qualified pharmacists. Would it work?

I’m not personally sure, but the drug problem here in Great Britain has become so desperate now, that I doubt if such methods could make it any worse. I believe it would work in a number of ways. I have already mentioned how it would put the dealers out of business, they wouldn’t be able to compete with the pharmaceutical giants in any way, especially price and quality. The smuggling and trafficking business would also have to switch its operations to other countries, there would be no market for their garbage here. Drugs related crimes, such as burglaries committed by desperate addicts would decrease with enormous significance, as addicts would be easier to treat and to control. Then there is the not so little matter of extra revenue, I doubt anyone believes that the government wouldn’t want to tax the hell out of such a profitable business.

I have seen enough of the way alcohol and tobacco products are manufactured and marketed in this country to know that controlled legalisation could be managed here. I also know how astringent the pharmaceutical authorities are, and am confident that the industry could easily cope with what to them would be simply a few new products. What I have never seen to date, is anyone in authority with the intestinal fortitude to even hint at such change. It seems to me that the subject of drug reform in this country is so taboo, that it is to be forever swept under the carpet. And the Labour government’s recent ridiculous stunt with the pretend legalisation of cannabis has merely swept it a little further.

As a footnote I would ask one last question, and it is up to you how you answer this. Which of the many popular but illegal “street” drugs are worse than alcohol and tobacco, and in what way?

Pete Williamson, NSG.

WORLDWIDE HEROS OF NATIONALISM - PART FOUR.

2008-08-25T19:46:00.003+01:00

ADRIEN ARCAND

Adrien Arcand (1899 – August 2, 1967), was a McGill University educated Montreal journalist, federalist and self-proclaimed Canadian führer. Arcand led a series of far right political movements in the 1930s and 1940s.

Arcand published and edited several anti-Semitic newspapers during this period, most notably Le Goglu, Le Miroir, and Le Chameau. He received covert funds from the leader of the Canadian Conservative Party Richard Bedford Bennett (who was Prime Minister of Canada from 1930 to 1935) to operate his newspapers and propagate antisemitism. In 1934, he established the Parti national social chrétien (National Social Christian Party), which advocated anti-communism and the deportation of Canadian Jews to Hudson Bay, an idea that was inspired by his friend, noted British Rhodesian fascist Henry Hamilton Beamish, who suggested sending the Jews to Madagascar. Even then, Bennett secretly hired Arcand as his chief electoral organiser in Quebec for the 1935 federal election.

In 1938, Arcand was chosen leader of the federalist/fascist National Unity Party of Canada, born of the fusion of his Parti National Social Chrétien with the prairie provinces’ Canadian Nationalist Party and Ontario’s Nationalist Party, which itself grew out of the Toronto Swastika Clubs of the early thirties. Arcand was always a staunch federalist and an anglophile. He received secret funds from Lord Sydenham, former governor of Bombay and a prominent fascist sympathizer in the British Conservative Party. He also maintained correspondence with Arnold Spencer Leese, chief of The Imperial Fascist League. Arcand’s party statutes called for the following oath to be taken at the beginning of every party meeting:

Moved by the unshakable faith in God, a profound love for Canada, ardent sentiments of patriotism and nationalism, a complete loyalty and devotion toward our Gracious Sovereign who forms the recognized Moved by the unshakable faith in God, a profound love for Canada, ardent sentiments of patriotism and nationalism, a complete loyalty and devotion toward our Gracious Sovereign who forms the recognized principle of active authority, a complete respect for the British North America Act, for the maintenance of order, for national prosperity, for national unity, for national honour, for the progress and the happiness of a greater Canada, I pledge solemnly and explicitly to serve my party. I pledge myself to propagate the principles of its program. I pledge myself to follow its regulation. I pledge myself to obey my leaders. Hail the party! Hail our Leader!

Arcand always was steadfastly opposed to Quebec nationalism. He wanted to build a powerful centralized Canadian Fascist state within the British Empire.

Arcand insists that his organisation has no sympathy with the extreme French nationalist movement represented by the group which split from Premier Duplessis, after he was returned to power because he would not go all the way they wished. "We were the first in Quebec to fight Separatism," Arcand declares, "and we are carrying on that fight very satisfactorily, swallowing many ex-members of that failing movement." Frankly, the National Social Christian Party is aiming for Dominion power, Arcand admits, describing Dominion power as the real key to the vital problems of this country.2

On May 30, 1940, he was arrested in Montreal for "plotting to overthrow the state" and interned for the duration of the war as a security threat. His party, then called the National Union Party, was banned. In the internment camp, he sat on a throne built by other prisoners and spoke of how he would rule Canada when Hitler conquered it.

Arcand ran for the Canadian House of Commons on two occasions. Despite being shunned by mainstream Quebecers in the post-war years, he managed to come in second with 29 per cent of the vote when he ran as a National Unity candidate in the riding of Richelieu—Verchères in the 1949 federal election . He came in second again with 39 per cent of the vote when he ran as a "Nationalist in Berthier—Maskinongé—delanaudière in the 1953 election.

Arcand never wavered in his belief in Adolf Hitler, and, in the 1960s, was a mentor to Ernst Zündel, who became a prominent Holocaust denier and neo-Nazi propagandist in the latter part of the 20th century.

On November 14, 1965, he gave a speech before a crowd of 900 partisans from all over Canada at the Centre Paul-Sauvé in Montreal. As reported in La Presse and Le Devoir, he took the occasion to thank the newly-elected Liberal Member of Parliament for Mount Royal, Pierre Trudeau, and former Conservative leader George Drew, for speaking in his defence when he was interned. However, both Trudeau and Drew denied that they had ever defended Arcand, or his views, and insisted that they had in fact been defending the principle of free speech even for fascists. Trudeau also denied later rumours - for which no evidence has been uncovered - that he and Arcand had once been members together of a secret Rosicrucian Order.

WORLDWIDE HEROS OF NATIONALISM - PART THREE.

2008-08-22T13:24:00.003+01:00

José Antonio Primo de Rivera

Life

José Antonio Primo de Rivera was the oldest son of General Miguel Primo de Rivera, who was prime minister and dictator during the reign of King Alfonso XIII of Spain from 1923 until 1930. In 1933, he founded Falange Española ("Spanish Phalanx"), a nationalist party inspired by the Fascist ideology. In 1934 his party merged with Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional-Sindicalista, forming the Falange Española de las Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional-Sindicalista under his leadership. In the general election in 1936, Falange won only 0.7% of the votes, but in the unstable political situation that emerged after the victory of the Popular Front (a coalition of various left-wing political organisations such as communists and socialists with liberal republicans like the Radicals), the party grew rapidly and by July of 1936 it had more than 40,000 members. Primo de Rivera was a supporter of the military uprising in July 1936 against the left-wing republican government, and during the Spanish Civil War the Falange became the dominant political movement of the Spanish National-syndicalists (the right-wing umbrella opposition against Popular Front government of the Republic). He was captured on the 6th July 1936, and held in captivity in Alicante until tried by a Popular Front of communists and anarchists. Sentenced to death, he was executed on 20th November. [edit] His relevance for Franco's regime Francisco Franco's Spanish government formed a cult of personality around Primo de Rivera. After his arrest by Republican forces in the Spanish Civil War, his Falangist supporters called him "El Ausente," a Spanish expression meaning "the Absent One" to symbolize his importance as a leader of the Nationalist forces, despite his absence. After he had been executed in prison, he was called "martyr of the Crusade" (against Bolshewism) by his supporters. Despite this, his execution arguably spared Franco a strong political adversary for the post-war period, since Franco had had so far a rather low-profile career in the military, while Primo de Rivera was much more charismatic and with a higher degree of education. In this regard, Primo de Rivera was a germanophile with a strong and consistent Fascist ideology, which, amongst other aspects, was definitely anti-monarchic, while Franco was primarily an anti-communist with a definitely clerical stance and lacked any clear position regarding the monarchy. During the Francoist régime, there was a plate on the outer wall of every parish, naming local soldiers and civilians killed by the republicans who died during the war (Caídos por Dios y por España, "Fallen for God and Spain"). Primo de Rivera's name was the first on every plate. In that period of history, an often used political slogan of the Falange party and its various branches to commemorate the civil war was "Jose Antonio presente!", which could be translated "I, Jose Antonio, am present!" as well as "We are ready, Jose Antonio!"[1] Primo de Rivera's sister, Pilar Primo de Rivera, founded the Sección Femenina, the female branch of Falange. The Sección Femenina aimed to make the Spanish women conform to prevailing conservative Catholic social traditions at the time. An upwards shot of the Valle de los Caídos An upwards shot of the Valle de los Caídos Franco ordered the building of the Valle de los Caídos mausoleum, where Primo de Rivera's corpse lies now. On November 20, 1975, Franco died, and his corpse was buried beside Primo de Rivera's. The 20th of November remains a symbolic date for the Spanish far-right because of the deaths of Primo de Rivera and Franco himself. The last statue left in Spain of Primo de Rivera was removed from Guadalajara in March 2005, after the Socialist government of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero decided it was not suitable.

WORLDWIDE HEROS OF NATIONALISM - PART TWO.

2008-08-20T11:43:00.000+01:00

LEON DEGRELLE – A GOOD EUROPEAN

by Constantin von Hoffmeister

In the middle of World War II, Leon Degrelle, born in 1906 in the small Belgian town of Bouillon, joined 600,000 other non-German volunteers to participate in the battles on the Eastern Front. After enduring severe hardships and having been wounded several times, Degrelle became the commander of a Waffen-SS division, the "Legion Wallonie." In 1941 Hitler approved of national divisions to be raised as antibolshevist units participating in the struggle against Communism in each country of Western Europe, as well as among the populations of the Axis countries, such as Croatia, Spain and Italy. Despite the past efforts of Napoleon, the Waffen-SS represented the first true pan-European army to ever exist. The monumental struggle of this army is described in Degrelle's famous epic "Campaign in Russia," which earned him fame in Europe to such an extent that he has been labeled the "Homer of the Twentieth Century."

Degrelle himself said about the Waffen-SS:

If the Waffen-SS had not existed, Europe would have been overrun entirely by the Soviets by 1944. They would have reached Paris long before the Americans. […] Without SS resistance the Soviets would have been in Normandy before General Dwight David Eisenhower. The people showed deep gratitude to the young men who sacrificed their lives. Not since the great religious orders of the Middle Ages had there been such selfless idealism and heroism. In this century of materialism, the SS stand out as a shining light of spirituality. I have no doubt whatever that the sacrifices and incredible feats of the Waffen-SS will have their own epic poets like Schiller. Greatness in adversity is the distinction of the SS.

Degrelle did not know at the time that he himself would become the epic chronicler of the incredible feats of the Waffen-SS.

Degrelle was already 35 years old when he joined the Wehrmacht along with other Walloon volunteers. After his contingent had been involved in numerous battles with considerable success, Reichsfuehrer-SS Heinrich Himmler was persuaded to incorporate the Walloons into the Waffen-SS. In 1944 Degrelle was highly decorated (including the Oak Leaves to the Knights Cross).

Degrelle was a friend and close associate of Adolf Hitler and a propaganda image among National Socialists for promoting their cause among foreigners. He became the most famous foreign volunteer in the entire German army, working his way up through the ranks from private to general.
Degrelle was able to get to know the most striking personalities of the Twentieth Century: Mussolini invited Degrelle to Rome, Churchill saw him in London and Hitler received him in Berlin. He was also a great visionary himself. At the end of World War One he already had the strong desire to win over his people and shape their destiny. Less than thirty years old, Degrelle was already deeply entrenched in the great struggle that would eventually shape the fate of Europe.

In 1918 Degrelle became the leader of the Rexists (after Christus Rex), a political party closely associated with Fascism and National Socialism, but essentially a movement of Christian renewal. After all, Degrelle was a devout Catholic. The Rexist reforms were aimed at creating social justice – the pillar of peace in a nation -, and strength within a system of collectivism. The argument was that an individual should always strive to work for the benefit of the whole. Rexism understood itself as being democratic and authoritarian with a strong social and moral character.
Degrelle realized that the outbreak of World War II could only lead to a socio-political renewal of Europe, especially since the struggle was directed against the inhumane system of Communism. It would become a battle of good versus evil, freedom versus oriental despotism.

After the collapse of National Socialist Germany, Degrelle fled to Norway where he boarded a plane with which he flew over Allied-occupied Europe, only to crash land in Spain. After the war, the Belgian government condemned Degrelle to death in absentia on charges of treason. The Spanish government under General Francisco Franco refused to extradite him. Leon Degrelle died in Malaga, Spain on April 1, 1994 at the age of 87.

"We are the true democrats ... Rex is the realm of total souls, which do not bargain, which march straight ahead, certain of the road. This is the true Rexist miracle; this faith, this unspoiled, burning confidence, this complete lack of selfishness and individualism, this tension of the whole being towards the service -- however ungrateful, no matter where, no matter how -- of a cause which transcends the individual, demanding all, promising nothing." – Leon Degrelle

WORLDWIDE HEROS OF NATIONALISM - PART ONE.

2008-08-19T17:22:00.000+01:00

Today I would like to begin my series of nationalist, white nationalist, and national socialist heroes. This is about heroes of the past, and has no bearing on those who put so much into our efforts today and for tomorrow.
---------------------------------

QUISLING!

The first hero of the past I would like to write about is Vidkun Quisling of Norway.
Early life

Vidkun Abraham Lauritz Jonssøn Quisling, born Telemark Norway 18th July 1887, son of a Church of Norway Pastor. When Quisling was still in his early teens, he was known for having a flair for mathematics, and he sent in corrections to a national mathematical textbook. Impressed by the age of the boy, the editors made the corrections, and included his name and some adulation as encouragement for other young boys to pay attention to their mathematics. Such was the Jewish inspired “hatred” associated with his name after the war that all editions since have kept the corrections and adulation but changed all references to his name to 'en gutt' ('a boy').

His early life was varied and successful; he became the country's best war-academy cadet upon graduation in 1911, and achieved the rank of major in the Norwegian army. He worked with Fridtjof Nansen in the Soviet Union during the famine of the 1920s. For his services in looking after British interests after having broken diplomatic relations with the Bolshevik government, Great Britain awarded him the CBE (which was later revoked due to Zionist control of the UK government and Royal Family).

Nasjonal Samling Party

The political party ”Nasjonal Samling” (National Unity) was formed in Oslo on the 17th May 1933, with Major Vidkun Quisling as leader, and State Attorney Johan Bernhard Hjort as second leader. At that time, Quisling was 46 years old, and Hjort was 38. This party was quite different than the other Norwegian political Parties at that time, and very clearly based its politics on a ”leader” (fører) system, quite far from the democratic standards in Norway.

The N.S Party Program clearly stated the abolition of all political parties; only one was to exist: N.S.

Vidkun Quisling was a remarkable person, with visions that only seldom fitted the real life. He had worked together with the famous Frithjof Nansen in Soviet, during the famine in the 1930´s, and had a reputation for being an intelligent, quiet and hard-working man. He saw himself as a philosopher, and created a new philosophy: the Universism. This was a strong mixture of spiritual and ideological elements: the Individual was to find personal salvation and freedom in a close co-operation between inner meditation, God and the Society. Quisling even made plans for a world-wide organization: The World Univerism League.
He had also served as Minister of Defense in the Agrarian Government 1931-33.

Symbols and expressions within N.S were taken from Norwegian Viking traditions. The main N.S symbol was an encircled Golden Cross on red background, the “St. Olav´s Cross”.

The party was organized in a ”National Organization” (Riksorganisasjon), a Woman Organization, (NS Kvinneorganisasjon), a Combat Organization (NS Kamporganisasjon), a Youth Organization, (Nasjonal Samlings Ungdoms-Fylking – NSUF) and the Hird. The latter was to be the hard-core political uniformed storm troops of NS, and equivalent to the German S.A.
The first Hird Commander (Rikshirdsjef) was J.B Hjort, later succeeded by Captain Oliver Møystad. Col. Konrad Sundlo periodically acted as a stand-in.

During the elections in 1933, Nasjonal Samling had a co-operation with the Farmers Aid organisation, (Bydgefolkets Krisehjelp), and they two finally got 27 850 votes. This was quite a huge number, since N.S only had existed for 4 months. At the county elections in 1934, N.S continued their success, especially in Stavanger where the local leader Gulbrand Lunde, a young and popular politician, finally collected 2558 votes for the Party.

In the early days, Nasjonal Samling was deeply religiously rooted, and gained relatively huge support from both the Church and the religious parts of the population. As the party grew more militant from 1935, the pro-German and anti-Semitic section of the Party got more power, and N.S lost most of their influence in the Church.
*
At the elections in 1936 N.S only got 26 577 votes. This was one of the reasons to the bitter conflict between Quisling and Hjort; the latter finally left the party together with several prominent members, as Hjort had many followers. From now on, Nasjonal Samling clearly moved from being a Party to getting more like a sect.

In the early days, N.S had a very distinct Nordic profile, and in many ways gave an impression of wanting to revive the ancient Viking regime in Norway. The Party hardly had a foreign policy at all, even If Quisling did attend the Italian-led “International Fascists Convention” in Montreaux in 1935, together with colleagues like Anton Mussert, Frits Clausen and Oswald Mosley.” Soon, members who admired Mussolini´s Italian fascist regime, and even Hitler’s Germany, showed a clear Germanic attitude. Quisling, who saw himself more a Prophet than a politician, hardly ever participated in debates or discussions. He mostly communicated in writing. This absence of leadership made National Samling a party of intrigues and rivalry at the costs of effectiveness.

The number of members in N.S is very difficult to estimate. A research by Bergen University in 1976, stated that only 2000 remained as members after the German invasion on the 9th April 1940. This number is, however, regarded as far to low in other researches. After the Invasion, the number of members grew to an estimate of 50 000, with an additional 6000 from NSUF. The number might even have been as high as 60 000.

During 1944-45, some members left the Party, and some were excluded, but in no large numbers.

Nasjonal Samling had a political program, which clearly was Nationalist to the extreme, and it also became more and more influenced by the German N.S.D.A.P. However, in the Party program dated 1937, Quisling stated that Nasjonal Samling had nothing to do with N.S.D.A.P, and the NS-newspapers denied all accusations of a racial based politics. N.S was, as quoted, a ”Deeply rooted Norwegian, National, Spiritual and Christian movement.”. Quisling often even stated that he had inspired Hitler to crate his ideology, since Quisling had created his political philosophy as early as in 1917-18.

*
The first ad hoc government, which Quisling suprisingly announced on the chaotic day of 9th April 1940, came as a surprise, and the statement shocked both the Germans as the Norwegian population. Actually it did even shock most members of the Government, as most were unaware of Quislings plans. It proved short-lived – and lasted only for five days.

Quisling never impressed the Germans, but had some support too: Alfred Rosenberg was enthusiastic about him, and prominent members of the German Navy, like Admiral Raeder also supported Quisling. This, together with Quislings personal appearance, made the relationship between the German leader in Norway, Reichskommisar Joseph Terboven and Quisling extremely bad.

Quisling pronounced his ”National Government” during two radio speeches on the evening of 9th April 1940.

Their fate after WW2.

During the Trials after the war, members of the NS Government got the following sentences:
Quisling, Hagelin and Skancke: death penalty. The latter, executed in August 1948 at the age of 58, was one of the last to get shot in Norway after receiving death penalty.
*
Stang, Lippestad, Fuglesang, Hustad, Meidell and Whist: lifetime imprisonment.
*
Fretheim, von Hirsch, Skarphagen, Vassbotten and Blehr: 20 years imprisonment.
*
Irgens: 15 years imprisonment
Lie died of unknown reasons on the same day that the Germans surrendered, and Riisnæs was institutionalised due to insanity. Released from the Hospital in the 60´s, he spent most of the seventies in Italy and Vienna, and finally died in Oslo,1987.

The last N.S prisoner was released in November 1957.

46 085 members of N.S got sentenced, and about 23 000 of them were imprisoned. 4800 of these were so-called “Frontfighters” (Frontkjempere).
90 000 individuals were investigated.

2008-08-19T15:01:00.000+01:00

Oh dear, looks like my little

blog is still upsetting the
stupids. Sorry girls, but if
you don't like me, try to
stop following me.
-------------------------------
-------------------------------

This blog is for those nationalists who wouldn't waste their time
on the pathetic Stormfront Britain forum, and do not wish to be
involved with the loonies now running what had turned out to be
an asylum.

But carry on moaning, how else would I know you were reading?
And it really does give me something to chuckle about.

Not all whites are welcome, quality over quantity!

2008-08-19T11:59:00.000+01:00

Disclaimer, This article was not written for or by anyone involved with the NSG. It is up to the individual what he or she makes of it or takes from it. I have posted this just to highlight exactly why nationalism's worst enemies are more often than not nationalists themselves. None of us are perfect, but if any of the below applies to you, then if possible sort it out, or stay out of nationalist politics.

PW.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written by a respected nationalist.

I've been involved in the so-called "right-wing" for a number of years now, but when I step back and look at our so-called movement, especially more recently, I can't help saying to myself, "Why am I surrounded by so many 'misfits'?"

I'm sure that if you are honest, you would have to agree with me, so let's go back to the Third Reich and look at the differences between then and now. Then, the people who flocked to the National Socialist cause, were young idealists fighting for what they believed in: their race and their nation. Self-sacrifice was commonplace and heroism was an everyday occurrence, both before the victory in 1933 when the Brownshirts fought the reds, losing over 25,000 men in the streets alone, and afterwards on the battlefields of World War 2 when legions of men from every European nation were decimated time and time again in the Crusade for Europe.

You just can not compare these men with the dregs that call themselves "right-wingers" today. National Socialists then were the elite of our race, the cream of European youth. Most of the so-called "right-wingers" around today wouldn't have been fit to dig the latrine pits for the Waffen SS yet they claim to represent the White race and declare themselves to be the so-called vanguard.

Why is there such a difference I hear you ask? The problem now is that since the war, pro-White groups have been desperate for the numbers and will accept absolutely anyone just because they're White and call themselves racists. It doesn't matter what sort of lowlife they are as long as they are "our way". Quite simply, the Nationalist organisations that exist at the moment will accept anyone. The only condition of membership they seem to have is the ability to pay an annual subscription.

Obviously not everyone on the so-called "right-wing" falls short of the high standards of the past: there are people out there who believe in our cause and are willing to stand up and fight for it but let's take a look at some of the "problem cases" who are attracted to movements like ours so you will be able to recognise them and then deal with them effectively.

1) The cowards: these unfortunately make up the bulk of the right-wing. Blokes who are nothing by themselves join up to be part of a gang, give it the right large one when they are at a Nationalist event, sticking the boot in when the numbers are on our side but in reality are the sort of blokes who would watch a couple of spades push in front of them in a queue and do nothing about it, just look away. You all know the sort; without the beer for "Dutch courage" they're nothing.

2) The inadequates and losers: again the "right" is full of these types. They join because no-one else will have them. They don't fit into any mainstream groups and so they turn to the groups that accept anyone - the "right-wing" - where they have instant friends and drinking buddies.

3) Faggots: because of the nature of the movement, which is comprised of a lot of young blokes, queers tend to be attracted to it for deviant reasons. Some of these perverts will claim to be racist but don't be fooled by this: they are nothing more than subhuman degenerates. Most of the faggots who worm their way into Nationalist organisations often find themselves being very quickly booted out - quite literally.

4) Passing-trade: these are people who suddenly appear in the movement out of nowhere, have a short burst of activism, and then disappear as quickly as they arrived. These people may just be looking for a new experience - something different to the mundanity of their everyday lives - or they may be among us for more sinister purposes. Whatever the reason, they are a complete waste of space and should never be trusted.

5) The sickos and wierdos: these are the sort of freaks who believe in the Hitler=Evil equation that is spread by the media. These types are usually involved in "Satanism", cults, paedophilia, you name it. Luckily these people are very few in number but always prove to be the most embarrassing when they are exposed in the press etc, and we are all then tarred with the same brush. These people do not belong among us; if they hadn't infiltrated the "right-wing" they would probably be in some sort of cult. Our enemies love deviants such as these (often because they share the same interests) and will often encourage them to join us.

6) Drunks: mentally, these people are among the weakest specimens of humanity. They are in their element in the "right wing" because most of it is just a big drinking club.

So there it is: you may not want to hear it but it's true. The "right wing" accepts anyone and everyone - it has NO standards. We set ourselves up as though we are better than everyone else and talk about the general population as though they are all scum. Well the truth is that, percentage-wise, we most probably have far more scumbags in our midst than exist in the so-called "non-racist" general population.

The "right-wing" has a choice to make: either it cleans up its act and introduces some standards to ensure the quality of its recruits or it carries on being a freak-show for the liberals to laugh at on the TV. Personally, I don't want it to be the latter and I doubt if you do. It's up to all you decent activists out there to make a stand and help clean up the movement. If that means a significant drop in numbers then so be it. It is far better to have a small but hard core of decent, clean-living, committed activists than a sprawling membership of inadequates.

2008 Red White & Blue!

2008-08-18T18:20:00.000+01:00

Just been speaking to one of my mates from the Covert Undercover Nuisance Tactics. Seems like all the boasting by the red scum this weekend was what it always turns out to be, bull plop. All the so called "UAF" did this past weekend, was annoy the good people of a normally peaceful part of the lovely Derbyshire countryside, and show a rural community something we nationalists already knew about. Indeed many local people will now know exactly who the real fascists are. But the best laugh of the day was saved for the brave "super radicle" class warriors of Antifa. Their attempt at sneaking up on the festival goers came to a screaming halt when they realised they were totally out of their depth, maybe there was a puddle? So scared of the prospect of having to confront real men in the middle of a field, they stood up and surrendered themselves and their weapons to thye police.

For more information, visit Covert Mansion (click on banner at the top of this post!)

STRASSERISM!

2008-08-18T17:21:00.000+01:00

Beware of the Reds in nationalism!

Ever since the National Socialist revolution in Germany, during the 1930’s and 40’s, a plague has ripped through the movement opposing every creditable and influential leader. Their opposition to everyone, from Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany to John Tyndall in Zionist Great Britain continues to this day. The Nationalist Support Group does not and never will approve of, nor encourage such divisionary machinations. This position will never change, and is just one of many reasons why the NSG will forever reserve the right to refuse any kind of membership or affiliation to any person without stated reason or explanation. Below is a couple of articles taken from Wikipedia which explain the beginning of Strasserism in Germany and how it infested the Nationalist movement in Great Britain. It still does to this day, albeit with much lower a profile leadership, relying on the dregs of the movement along with a handful of Nazi uniform fetishists. The main culprit for the red infestation of Nationalism was the younger of the two brothers, Otto Strasser, and in recognition of this I will concentrate specifically on him.

Otto Strasser

Otto Strasser (1897-1974) had also been a member of the Freikorps, but went on to join the SPD and fought against the Kapp putsch. However he joined the Nazi Party in 1925, but nonetheless retained his ideas about the importance of socialism. Considered more of a radical than his brother, Otto Strasser was expelled by the Nazi Party in 1930 and set up his own dissident group, the Black Front, which called for a specifically German nationalist form of socialist revolution. He fled Germany in 1933 to live in Czechoslovakia and Canada before returning to West Germany in later life, all the while writing prolifically about Hitler and what he saw as his betrayal of national socialist ideals.

Strasserism

The name Strasserism came to be applied to this form of Nazism that developed around the brothers. Although they had been involved in the creation of the National Socialist Program of 1920, both called on the party to commit to 'breaking the shackles of finance capital'.[1] This opposition to "Jewish finance capitalism," which they contrasted to "productive capitalism," was shared by Adolf Hitler himself, who borrowed it from Gottfried Feder.[2]

This populist and antisemitic form of anti-Capitalism was further developed in 1925 when Otto Strasser published the Nationalsozialistische Briefe, which discussed notions of class conflict, wealth redistribution and a possible alliance with the Soviet Union. His 1930 follow-up Ministersessel oder Revolution ('Cabinet Seat or Revolution') went further by attacking Hitler's betrayal of the purported socialist aspect of Nazism, as well as criticizing the notion of Führerprinzip.[3] Whilst Gregor Strasser echoed many of the calls of his brother, his influence on the ideology is less, due to his remaining in the Nazi Party longer and to his early death. Otto, meanwhile, continued to expand his argument, calling for the break-up of large estates and the development of something akin to a guild system and the related establishment of a Reich cooperative chamber to take a leading role in economic planning.[4]

Strasserism, therefore, became a distinct strand of neo-Nazism that, whilst holding on to previous Nazi ideals such as militant nationalism and anti-Semitism, added a strong critique of capitalism and framed this in the demand for a more "socialist-based" approach to economics.

It is disputed, however, if Strasserism effectively represented a distinct form of Nazism, or not. According to historian Ian Kershaw, "the leaders of the SA [which included Gregor Strasser] did not have another vision of the future of Germany or another politic to propose." But they advocated the radicalization of the Nazi regime, and the toppling of the German elites, calling Hitler's rise to power a "half-revolution," which needed to be completed.[5]

Strasserism in the UK

Strasserism emerged in the United Kingdom in the early 1970s and centered around the National Front publication Britain First, the main writers of which were David McCalden, Richard Lawson and Denis Pirie. Opposing the leadership of John Tyndall, they formed an alliance with John Kingsley Read and ultimately followed him into the National Party.[9] The NP called for British workers to "seize the right to work" and offered a fairly Strasserite economic policy.[10] Nonetheless, the NP failed to last for very long. Due in part to Read's lack of enthusiasm for Strasserism, the main exponents of the idea drifted away.

The idea was reintroduced to the NF by Andrew Brons in the early 1980s when he decided to make the party's ideology clearer.[11] However Strasserism was soon to become the province of the radicals in the Official National Front, with Richard Lawson brought in in a behind the scenes role to help direct policy.[12]. Ultimately this Political Soldier wing opted for the indigenous alternative of distributism, but nonetheless their strong anti-capitalist rhetoric, as well as that of their International Third Position successor, demonstrated influences of Strasserism. From this background Troy Southgate emerged, whose own ideology and those of related groups such as the English Nationalist Movement and National Revolutionary Faction were influenced by Strasserism.

Today

The Strasserites of today are made up almost entirely of fringe group wannabe “leaders”, and the rejects of the larger or “mainstream” nationalist organisations. They are typically very loud, and very fast and loose with their accusations against the majority of other Nationalists. Without the use of the internet these freaks would simply fade into the background where they belong. It is my personal opinion that they should be starved of the oxygen of their own self importance, and ignored totally.

Pete Williamson, NSG.

WILIAM GAYLEY SIMPSON

2008-08-18T14:57:00.000+01:00

WILLIAM GAYLEY SIMPSON

On Religion.

"For a people's religion should come out of its
own blood. It should be its own innermost soul
made manifest, the elevation before its eyes
of its own hopes and dreams, of all the lessons
it has learned through its own immemorial
experience."

'Which Way Western Man' Chap. IIIb, p. 84

Read the full book review HERE

Sent in by Octavian

2008-07-27T18:10:00.000+01:00

EDDY MORRISON SUPPORTS THE NSG!

The immensly popular and charismatic nationalist of over 41 years, Eddy Morrison has written a message of support and encouragement to the NSG received today. It is of course an honour to receive the support of such an important figure in British Nationalist politics.

Thank you Eddy, we salute you!

Fellow Patriots!

I would like to categorically state that I support the initiative of the Nationalist Support Group. It is above mere party labels and fosters the excellent idea of White patriots helping other White Nationalists - regardless of party or affiliation.

There is no membership requirements but I urge all true British racial-nationalists to support the NSG initiative and also send in your comments to this Comrade's NSG Blog as I have.

Eddy Morrison.

2008-07-27T18:07:00.000+01:00

http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/349545

NSG? Whats all that about???

2008-07-18T15:22:00.000+01:00

NATIONALIST SUPPORT GROUP

Obstacles are those frightful things you see when
you take your eyes off your goal.

Henry Ford

WHAT IS THE NATIONALIST SUPPORT GROUP?

The NSG is a new networking organisation for all Nationalists within the United Kingdom. The main aim is to promote unity within the movement by offering an umbrella organisation, but by vigorously excluding those who's only aim has been to cause division.

There is no membership fee for this group, no membership card, and no huge leadership structure. To start with only known and trusted comrades will be invited to join, from then on a system of sponsorship will be introduced. Any member will be able to recommend or sponsor another nationalist, on the understanding that he or she guarantees that person's conduct and credentials as a genuine nationalist and asset to the group.

There will be no “Women's Division” or “Youth Group”, division within the movement is something we disagree with most strongly. From the outset we will support all genuine Nationalists and all Nationalist organisations, however support can be withdrawn for any organisation at any time, this would not necessarily extend to individual members of that particular group or party. All genuine Nationalist activities will be supported and, so long as the activity is not illegal, we will participate if welcome to do so and encourage our membership likewise. Eventually we will begin to hold our own activities, but these will not be advertised and those outside of our network will probably only know about them after they have taken place.

Initially the NSG will be a small blog based group of trusted comrades with no official gatherings, we will communicate regularly as we build, and closed meetings will be arranged nationally and locally as our numbers increase. We will not be standing any individuals in any political elections, this is for political parties, and we are strictly not a political party.

All members will be encouraged, wherever possible, to help one another in the community. This includes buying or selling from or to other members or fellow nationalists, employing or working for one another, and helping one another in emergencies and in times of need. We will exchange ideas, share books, pass on the knowledge we possess to one another and to the future generation. Little by little we will build a national community that will eventually become a collective of smaller local communities but will still continue to network nationally.

REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL NSG MEMBERS.

1.You will be a white male or female of European extraction only.
2.You will be totally heterosexual.
3.You will be against race mixing and have no mixed race offspring.
4.The only religions accepted will be Christian or those of Ancient Europe such as Odinism.
5.This group will not be used as a recruitment ground for any other.
6.Any suspected infiltrator will be suspended pending expulsion, along with any member sponsored or recommended by that person.
7.All members will agree to offer whatever help, encouragement, or support they can to other members.
8.All NSG business is confidential and not to be discussed with anyone outside the group.
9.All members must attend or take part in at least two nationalist gatherings or activities every year.
10.At election times NSG members must do whatever they can to help whoever is standing in their own area for whatever nationalist party.
11.Infighting will not be tolerated and will lead to immediate expulsion and even proscription in some cases.
12.Our reputation will not be sullied by poor behaviour, all NSG members will be required to conduct themselves properly and with the correct discipline.
13. We will observe the laws of the land at all times, even though we seek to change them. We will neither condone or encourage any illegal activities.
14.We Must Secure The Existence Of Our People And A Future For White Children.

The Nationalist Support Group is a group for volunteers dedicated to nationalism and the preservation of white indigenous people. We mean no harm to any other group, nor do we promote hate in any of its forms.

Visit Our Blog: http://nsguk.blogspot.com/

Email us: nsguk@gmx.com

This document can be distributed freely as long as it is not altered or edited in any way.

Anonymous callers!

2008-07-16T00:53:00.000+01:00

A THOUGHT FOR THE DAY!

2008-07-09T20:44:00.000+01:00

INFIGHTING?

2008-07-07T18:45:00.001+01:00

Its time to put a stop to infighting, but how? How about getting together in a none party environment and discussing the things that matter? We have much more in common than we have differences, the enemy know this which is why they infiltrate and encourage infighting.